Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nathan Ponwith vs Derek Pham Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ponwith vs Pham analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathan Ponwith vs Derek Pham Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ponwith 1 - 0 Pham
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ponwith has won 50.19% of points on their second serve, while Pham has won 42.93%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ponwith, in recent form, has won 50.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pham has won 55.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.4% and 33.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ponwith has saved 56.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pham has saved 48.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ponwith has won 35.71% of matches played (W/L 20/ 36), with Pham winning 54.55% (W/L 12/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 38/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Pham has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 40/ 28), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 14/ 14), where as Pham has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 12/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ponwith winning 1 times and Pham being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ponwith winning 2 and Pham winning 1. The last match between Ponwith and Pham was at the M15 San Diego, 14-06-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Nathan Ponwith getting the victory 6-7(6) 6-1 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ponwith and Pham have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ponwith winning 1 times and Pham 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ponwith winning 0, and Pham 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ponwith has played against opponents with an average rank of 158.63 while Pham has played against players with an average rank of 230.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ponwith has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pham has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ponwith has converted 39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pham has converted 56.82% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
720
Rank
367
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
893
Rank
786
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
56% (175-139)
Career Total W/L
54% (41-35)
48% (16-17)
YTD W/L
43% (3-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nathan Ponwith vs Derek Pham For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Ponwith VS Pham
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Nathan Ponwith | Derek Pham |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:5:0 | 3:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (73/104) | 57% (59/103) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (52/73) | 69% (41/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (14/31) | 32% (14/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (6/14) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (48/103) | 37% (38/104) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Derek Pham
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
114
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nathan Ponwith | Derek Pham |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (16/17) | 43% (3/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (37/42) | 53% (9/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (367/378) | 50% (80/81) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 54% (14/12) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 85 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 140 | 30 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:20 | 1:44:17 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 168.55 | 297.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1450/2476) | 56% (231/415) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (952/1450) | 70% (161/231) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (515/1026) | 43% (79/184) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (94/241) | 57% (25/44) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (967/2421) | 42% (179/422) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 54% (14/12) | 43% (3/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (16/33) | 43% (3/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 62% (8/13) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 69% (16/11) | 50% (6/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 31% (16/5) | 50% (6/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (17/5) | 0% (1/0) |
Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Nathan Ponwith
69%
(
76 of
110)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Noah Zamora
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Nathan Ponwith
58%
(
63 of
108)
1st Serve %
69%
(
69 of
100)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
60%
(
27 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
34%
(
37 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
100)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Patrick Maloney
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
63 of
90)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Derek Pham
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
114
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Alexander Petrov
70%
(
78 of
111)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
45 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Henrik Wiersholm
55%
(
57 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Nathan Ponwith
65%
(
70 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
73 of
123)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
46 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
57 of
123)
118
Total Points Won
112
|
3-6 7-6(10) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Nathan Ponwith
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Collin Altamirano
57%
(
58 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
4
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
48 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Derek Pham Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Derek Pham
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
44%
(
41 of
94)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
10
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Derek Pham
Player
Adam Neff
50%
(
38 of
76)
1st Serve %
34%
(
25 of
73)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Derek Pham
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
114
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Derek Pham
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Derek Pham
Player
Anders Matta
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Derek Pham
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Derek Pham
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Derek Pham
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Derek Pham
Player
Noah Schachter
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Derek Pham
Player
Alex Martinez
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ponwith Vs Pham Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ponwith are available here and Pham photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
